In this study, we investigate the application of supervised machine learning algorithms for estimating the Ultimate Tensile Strength (UTS) of Polylactic Acid (PLA) specimens fabricated using the Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) process. A total of 31 PLA specimens were prepared, with Infill Percentage, Layer Height, Print Speed, and Extrusion Temperature serving as input parameters. The primary objective was to assess the accuracy and effectiveness of four distinct supervised classification algorithms, namely Logistic Classification, Gradient Boosting Classification, Decision Tree, and K-Nearest Neighbor, in predicting the UTS of the specimens. The results revealed that while the Decision Tree and K-Nearest Neighbor algorithms both achieved an F1 score of 0.71, the KNN algorithm exhibited a higher Area Under the Curve (AUC) score of 0.79, outperforming the other algorithms. This demonstrates the superior ability of the KNN algorithm in differentiating between the two classes of ultimate tensile strength within the dataset, rendering it the most favorable choice for classification in the context of this research. This study represents the first attempt to estimate the UTS of PLA specimens using machine learning-based classification algorithms, and the findings offer valuable insights into the potential of these techniques in improving the performance and accuracy of predictive models in the domain of additive manufacturing.

In this study, we introduce application of Neurosymbolic Artificial Intelligence (NSAI) for predicting the impact strength of additive manufactured polylactic acid (PLA) components, representing the first-ever use of NSAI in the domain of additive manufacturing. The NSAI model amalgamates the advantages of neural networks and symbolic AI, offering a more robust and accurate prediction than traditional machine learning techniques. Experimental data was collected and synthetically augmented to 1000 data points, enhancing the model's precision. The Neurosymbolic model was developed using a neural network architecture comprising input, two hidden layers, and an output layer, followed by a decision tree regressor representing the symbolic component. The model's performance was benchmarked against a Simple Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model by assessing mean squared error (MSE) and R-squared (R2) values for both training and validation datasets. The results reveal that the Neurosymbolic model surpasses the Simple ANN model, attaining lower MSE and higher R2 values for both training and validation sets. This innovative application of the Neurosymbolic approach in estimating the impact strength of additive manufactured PLA components underscores its potential for optimizing the additive manufacturing process. Future research could investigate further refinements to the Neurosymbolic model, extend its application to other materials and additive manufacturing processes, and incorporate real-time monitoring and control for enhanced process optimization.